<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tech Debug &#187; os</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techdebug.com/blog/category/os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techdebug.com</link>
	<description>Why talk when you can fly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 07:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bootcamp 3.0 fixes WinXP BSOD for Multitouch Trackpad</title>
		<link>http://techdebug.com/blog/2009/09/23/bootcamp-3-0-fixes-winxp-bsod-for-multitouch-trackpad/</link>
		<comments>http://techdebug.com/blog/2009/09/23/bootcamp-3-0-fixes-winxp-bsod-for-multitouch-trackpad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lantrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BSOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applemtp.sys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bootcamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techdebug.com/?p=565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple released Bootcamp 2.1 with OS 10.5, which allows you to dual boot to Windows XP/Vista on your Mac. Subsequenet to that release, there was a driver update for the Multitouch trackpad which was suppose to improve souble tapping, etc. However it caused a Blue Screen of Death (BSOD) the moment you double tapped, courtesy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple released Bootcamp 2.1 with OS 10.5, which allows you to dual boot to Windows XP/Vista on your Mac.<br />
Subsequenet to that release, there was a driver <a href="http://support.apple.com/downloads/Multi_Touch_Trackpad_Update_1_1_for_Windows">update</a> for the Multitouch trackpad which was suppose to improve souble tapping, etc. However it <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=10257541">caused</a> a Blue Screen of Death (BSOD) the moment you double tapped, courtesy of <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=10257454">applemtp.sys</a>.</p>
<p>Many people sent suggestions to Apple to fix this, but it seemed to be falling on deaf ears.</p>
<p>Little did we know that Apple were releasing a new version of the touchpad driver included with Bootcamp 3.0 on the Snow Leopard install DVD.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve updated my Bootcamp to 3.0, and indeed the <em>applemtp.sys</em> driver version has increased to <b>2.1.2.112</b>. The <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3777">FAQ</a> for the Snow Leopard update states that Bootcamp 3.0 has:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Improved tap-to-click support &#8211; The ability to tap the track pad to click the mouse button is now supported on all Mac portables that run Boot Camp.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>In my tests, so far, there has been no more crashes. I get to use double finger right click tap, and the track pad responsiveness that I got in the older buggy driver is back as well.</p>
<p>Thanks Apple. No more BSOD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techdebug.com/blog/2009/09/23/bootcamp-3-0-fixes-winxp-bsod-for-multitouch-trackpad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laptop HDD failure</title>
		<link>http://techdebug.com/blog/2007/11/04/laptop-hdd-failure/</link>
		<comments>http://techdebug.com/blog/2007/11/04/laptop-hdd-failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 06:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lantrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon copy cloner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data rescue II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techdebug.com/blog/2007/11/04/laptop-hdd-failure/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Friday at work my Mac (OS X 10.4) laptop HDD died. After the purchase of an extra external HDD and some custom recovery software, Data Rescue II, I tried to recover as much as I could. The bad news is the Hard drive had not just gotten corrupted, but failed. After an attempt to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float: right; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 10px"><img src='http://techdebug.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/drescue.jpg' alt='Data Rescue II' /></p>
<p>Last Friday at work my Mac (OS X 10.4) laptop HDD died. After the purchase of an extra external HDD and some custom recovery software, <a href="http://www.prosofteng.com/products/data_rescue.php">Data Rescue II</a>, I tried to recover as much as I could. The bad news is the Hard drive had not just gotten corrupted, but failed. After an attempt to clone it to a second drive for analysis, and during my recovery attempt it developed the click of death. Now it no longer appears in the Hardware list on Data Rescue.</p>
<p>However, I was lucky on two counts:</p>
<ul>
<li>I sync my entire iTunes library music+photos to my ipod <em>WITH</em> the full resolution photo option enabled</li>
<li>I recently started using <a href="http://www.bombich.com">Carbon Copy cloner</a> to sync to an external Firewire drive</li>
</ul>
<p style="float: left; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-right: 10px"><img src='http://techdebug.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/ccc.gif' alt='CCC' /></p>
<p>The external HDD was bootable and I got my system back online with it, albeit 4 weeks old. Carbon Copy Cloner had cloned all the data, and made the drive bootable as requested. <strong>Note: using a firewire HDD was required to make it bootable</strong>. I&#8217;m not sure if this is still valid with newer intel Macs.</p>
<p>The iTunes sync alone saved my music purchases and iPhotos from the last 4 weeks. I will be sure to commence a more thorough backup regime, and I will be using my 2 HDD&#8217;s now as Primary and Secondary backups &#8211; one being offsite (at work). Its not worth the hassle of having anything less.</p>
<p>Are you lucky enought to have upgraded to OSX 10.5 already? You might be thinking you could use <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/timemachine.html">Time Machine</a>, but it wont produce an instantly usable bootable backup in the case of complete HDD failure. I think Time Machine will complement any use of CCC.</p>
<p>I did lose 4 weeks of Mail, Documents, and a new CVS repository I setup &#8211; but this is small compared to what could have been lost.</p>
<p>The lesson learnt is that anyone with a mac should buy an external firewire hard drive of the same size or greater than their &#8220;Macintosh HD&#8221;; <a href="http://www.bombich.com/software/ccc.html">Clone it with CCC</a>; and reclone it regularly (synchronise option). This will prevent the heartache of loosing all your photos, music and data in this electronic world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techdebug.com/blog/2007/11/04/laptop-hdd-failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Complete Guide to Mac/Windows Interoperability</title>
		<link>http://techdebug.com/blog/2007/10/20/the-complete-guide-to-macwindows-interoperability/</link>
		<comments>http://techdebug.com/blog/2007/10/20/the-complete-guide-to-macwindows-interoperability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 08:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lantrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifehacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techdebug.com/blog/2007/10/20/the-complete-guide-to-macwindows-interoperability/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;ve got a household full of PC&#8217;s and you&#8217;ve stopped yourself from getting a Mac because you don&#8217;t want to deal with incompatibilities. Eight years ago that would&#8217;ve been understandable, but today Mac OS and Windows can work together in harmony on the same home network. Here&#8217;s a primer on how the two systems inter-operate. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got a household full of PC&#8217;s and you&#8217;ve stopped yourself from getting a Mac because you don&#8217;t want to deal with incompatibilities. Eight years ago that would&#8217;ve been understandable, but today Mac OS and Windows can work together in harmony on the same home network. Here&#8217;s a primer on how the two systems inter-operate.</p>
<p>I have been using Macs now for 5 years, and the compatibility issues that one would have been there are practically gone. Check out the article at LifeHacker for the full details.</p>
<p><a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/geek-to-live/the-complete-guide-to-macwindows-interoperability-311618.php">read more</a> | <a href="http://digg.com/software/The_Complete_Guide_to_Mac_Windows_Interoperability">digg story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techdebug.com/blog/2007/10/20/the-complete-guide-to-macwindows-interoperability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM loves Solaris</title>
		<link>http://techdebug.com/blog/2007/08/20/ibm-loves-solaris/</link>
		<comments>http://techdebug.com/blog/2007/08/20/ibm-loves-solaris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lantrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techdebug.com/blog/2007/08/20/ibm-loves-solaris/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jonathan Schwartz the SUN CTO detailed on his blog about the new deal between Sun and IBM that allows IBM to offer Solaris x86 as a supported OS on their hardware. What does this mean for sysadmins around the world? More Solaris. That&#8217;s OK in my books. The less windows servers the better. Someone should [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan Schwartz the SUN CTO <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/jonathan/entry/momentous_day_for_solaris/">detailed on his blog</a> about the new deal between Sun and IBM that allows IBM to offer Solaris x86 as a supported OS on their hardware. What does this mean for sysadmins around the world? More Solaris. That&#8217;s OK in my books. The less windows servers the better.<br />
Someone <a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/migratetoibm/sun.html?&#038;ca=qapromo-s0stg-b0stg-l0mig-d0stgsmb-n033-o0fromsun-g0usen">should tell IBM</a> about their new interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techdebug.com/blog/2007/08/20/ibm-loves-solaris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MS Vista Not Compatible With SQL Server</title>
		<link>http://techdebug.com/blog/2006/12/18/ms-vista-not-compatible-with-sql-server/</link>
		<comments>http://techdebug.com/blog/2006/12/18/ms-vista-not-compatible-with-sql-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lantrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lantrix.homeip.net/2006/12/18/ms-vista-not-compatible-with-sql-server/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an article by Fortune&#8217;s Owen Thomas on Vista not being compatible with SQL Server. An excerpt: &#8216;But now Microsoft has a problem. Vista, its long-awaited update to the Windows operating system, can&#8217;t run the current version of SQL Server. The company is working on a SQL upgrade that is compatible with Vista &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/12/14/magazines/business2/microsoft_vista.biz2/index.htm">article by Fortune&#8217;s Owen Thomas</a> on Vista not being compatible with SQL Server. An excerpt:</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8216;But now Microsoft has a problem. Vista, its long-awaited update to the Windows operating system, can&#8217;t run the current version of SQL Server. The company is working on a SQL upgrade that is compatible with Vista &#8211; called SQL Server 2005 Express Service Pack 2 &#8211; but it&#8217;s in beta and can be licensed only for testing purposes. Microsoft hasn&#8217;t set a release date for the new SQL program.&#8217;
</p></blockquote>
<p>Microsoft is making the world worse with Vista.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s two of their own products not compatible. Zune and SQL2005. Another good reason to use a nicer operating system, like <a href="http://openbsd.org">OpenBSD</a>, <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/index.html">Mac OSX</a> or if you&#8217;re in the corporate world <a href="http://sun.com/solaris">Solaris</a></p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/16/1512210">Slashdot</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techdebug.com/blog/2006/12/18/ms-vista-not-compatible-with-sql-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
